LIfe by the Marshmallow
Today’s Boston Globe contains an article written by Carey Goldberg that revisits the famous marshmallow experiments of 40 years ago in order to gain new insights into our ability to exert self-control. The experiment itself was simple in that children were promised a reward of two marshmallows if they could resist eating the one temptingly placed before them for a certain amount of time. Accompanying the Globe article is a priceless picture in grainy black and of a young girl gripping the desk in front of her and leaning back with her eyes gazing up in apparent delicious torment, a photo of a thousand words if there ever was one. Rather than recount the entire article and all its obvious ramifications, let me focus on one passage:
"Over and over, research is showing that the trick is to shift activity from "hot," more primitive areas deep in the brain to "cool," more rational areas mainly in the higher centers of the brain. There are many ways to cool a hot stimulus, said Mischel, who is president of the Association for Psychological Science. Say you are determined to resist the chocolate cake at a restaurant. You must distract yourself from the waiter's dessert tray. You can also focus on long-term consequences and make them "hot" - by vividly imagining your future tummy and hip bulges - or think of the cake in the cooler abstract, as a thing that will make you fat and clog your arteries.”
No matter where the ability to resist the gratification of Now for the greater reward of Later ultimately derives from, it is an ability that few of our boys on Penikese have. Some have brains damaged by trauma, some have inherent brain wiring problems, others have impulse disorders and developmental delays, and some a combination of all these. The bottom line is that many essentially live their lives from moment to moment (hence this posting’s title), driven by whatever it is they want or don’t want right now, without any apparent regard for greater rewards or consequences that might occur after as a result.
The Penikese stories we could tell to exemplify this behavior, often decried and judged as merely a choice when – although indeed ultimately a choice for which they are always accountable - so much else goes into it. In a fashion similar to the hot and cool model described above we sometimes liken the problem to brain transmission trouble: for whatever reason, our boys have little control over the process of shifting from lower brain reactive functioning to higher, reasoned brain functioning. We try many different things to build whatever improved ability we can through behavioral and cognitive interventions, medications, and neurofeedback, and time and practice, lots. Some boys might never achieve normal in this regard, but any improvement can make an extraordinary difference over a lifetime.
On a lighter note, as I read the article I also couldn’t shake the humorous image of one of our boys taking this same experiment. So driven by what he wants, I imagine him immediately devouring the first marshmallow and then, as soon as the person conducting the experiment comes into the room, jumping or badgering the poor soul into submission for the other two in their pocket. With the result a grand total of all three marshmallows, I would describe this as a spirited Penikese-style free market approach.


